Buy ARINC Guidance For Tool And Test Equipment (Tte) Equivalency from SAI Global. mended in the amm, equivalency must be established by following the detailed guidance provided in the arinc report. , “guidance for tool and test equip. ARINC Uploaded by Anonymous QFuHHlM. ARINC Report Copyright: © All Rights Reserved. Download as PDF or read online from Scribd. Flag for.
|Published (Last):||7 June 2013|
|PDF File Size:||4.91 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.51 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee AEEC is an arind body of airline technical professionals that leads the development of technical standards for airborne electronic equipmentincluding avionics and in-flight entertainment equipment-used in commercial, military, and srinc aviation. Equivalent equipment should be: BMH 53 It consists of a test box Category 3 that has been designed and fabricated in-house and includes standard shop test equipment Category 2 also used in various other applications.
Historical data, showing successful performance of the aircraft system or component may be acceptable evidence of equivalence when utilized in conjunction with other process elements such as configuration, inspection, and other maintenance data.
Other organizations, such as airframe manufacturers, avionics vendors, etc.
Product Focus: Expanding Scope of ARINC 625 Test Equipment
Forthe working arincc is seeking to make the document more generic and easier to work with, relating to all types of test programs.
For purposes of this report, equivalent equipment is defined as alternate equipment to that specified by the OEM that correctly performs the task at hand. Document Number Technical Assessment: It covers the technical support and data packages TSDPs that avionics original equipment manufacturers OEMs should supply adinc third-party test program set TPS providers as the prerequisite for high-quality test solutions.
Other shareholders include a number of non-U. Proposed FAA Order If no such group is known to exist, a srinc to form a new group may be made. In such cases, the selection of alternate TTE should be based on meeting the original maintenance task requirement, rather than showing equivalency to the OEM-recommended TTE.
Product Focus: Expanding Scope of ARINC Test Equipment – Avionics
Policy, purpose, and scope of the equivalency process? For example, narrative sentences may be changed to bullet items, etc.
Comments Anything else deemed useful to the committees for prioritization of this work. Attachment 4 is general guidance and may be modified as needed.
The form and format of the documentation in a CMM is not standardized nor is the means for verifying the quality of the data therein. Calibration data for Starrett dial indicators supplied by Starrett. Equivalence is based on meeting the derived requirements and correlating the alternate TTE result with the OEM required result. Committee Evaluation and Acceptance or Rejection The annual work program for each Committee is normally established at its annual meeting. Routine Priority — technical solution to proceed at a arnc pace Proposals may have designated coordination with other groups.
Mueller says that operators need to manage fleet-wide software configuration for on-board loadable equipment. It was felt that this situation was unachievable.
ARINC | Guidance For Tool and Test Equipment (TTE) Equivalency | Document Center, Inc.
The alternate tool was properly marked and entered into the configuration management system as an alternate for AGE Rev Basic. The use of ARINC Standards results in substantial benefits to airlines by allowing avionics interchangeability and commonality and reducing avionics cost by promoting competition. IT Assessment report B Derived Task and Tool Requirements Section 4. The component manufacturers should assure that task requirements are not overstated. Inthe working group will define the TSDPs to include test specifications and any additional information needed to implement a test.
Verification also requires evaluating the products of each phase to ensure correctness and consistency with respect to the products and standards provided as input to that phase. Because of that duplication, the committee is adding a reference to in The major difference between the two tools is in the method by which the bearing centreline distance is obtained.
These requirements should include: Category 1 — Generic TTE, not specified by source documentation This category includes commercial off the shelf tools and other equipment that are not specified by part number e. All recommendations to the committees to establish or reauthorize a project, whether originated by an airline or from the industry, should be prepared using the APIM template.
An APIM may be initiated by anyone in the airline community, e.