Alexandre Astruc’s canonical essay, ‘The Birth of a New Avant-Garde: La Caméra -Stylo’ (), is considered a key precursor in the study of cinematic. La caméra-stylo. Alexandre Astruc. “What interests ine in the cinema is abstraction.’ (Orson Welles). One casinot help noticing that something is happening in the. Influenced by the introduction of the revolutionary 16mm film technology; French Filmmaker and critic Alexandre Astruc predicted a.
|Published (Last):||26 October 2017|
|PDF File Size:||2.83 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.54 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
He believed that cinema is just like literature; not just a particular art but a language which can express any thought. In the future, Astruc believes, not only will more people have access to cameras, but they will also have more flexibility in how they screen a film.
It is such bodily advances that lead to the development of speech and language, both stylp which are made possible by the peculiar features of human anatomy. Edinburgh University Press, So, in the case of the human, biological evolution and technical evolution are necessarily intertwined.
It was while he was in prison that he began studying and practicing philosophy through a series of ascetic reading and writing exercises. Influenced by the introduction of the revolutionary 16mm film technology; French Filmmaker and critic Alexandre Astruc predicted a breakthrough in patterns of production and distribution in the moving picture.
Every film, because its primary function is to move, i. Objectivity is thus relocated in us rather than in the world. There will be several cinemas just as today there are several literatures, for the cinema, like literature, is not so much a particular art as a language which can express any sphere of thought.
It is by clarifying these relationships, by making astrucc tangible allusion, that the cinema can really make itself the vehicle of thought.
Problems such as the translation into cinematic terms of verbal tenses and logical relationships interest us much more than the creation of the exclusively visual and static art dreamt of astrux the surrealists. He was incarcerated for five years for armed robbery.
This metaphor has a very precise sense. It is this kind of singular experience that sets the stage for true individuation, one whose outcome cannot be known in advance. Born inBernard Stiegler studied philosophy with Jacques Derrida, whose influence is evident in his writing style, his attraction to neologisms, as well aztruc in his skills at deconstructing the texts of other philosophers.
This idea of the cinema expressing ideas is not perhaps a new one. Astruc begins his essay by suggesting that something qualitatively new is happening in the cinema. This has nothing to do with a school, or even a movement.
This unpredictability is the result of a number of factors, and they are not all part of the same industrialisation or corporatisation of the medium. Whereas Kant proposes that the a priori coordinates of understanding are somehow innate, Stiegler argues otherwise: This art, although blessed with an enormous potential, is an easy prey to prejudice; it cannot go on for ever ploughing the same field of realism and social fantasy cwmera has been bequeathed to it by the popular novel.
After having been successively a fairground attraction, an amusement analogous to boulevard theatre, or a means of preserving the images of an era, it is gradually becoming a language.
These concepts or signs allow us to reflect upon our experiences, to come to a new understanding of their meaning and relevance. La Camera-Style, by Alexandre Astruc.
La Camera Stylo – Alexandre Astruc
This inheritance is the result of technics that allow for the preservation and dissemination of cultural memory. For more, see Bernard Stiegler trans. In a similar vein, we can easily extend his comments on 16mm film to the emergence of digital video cameras, which now make it easier than ever for individuals to write with the camera — literally so. Well, the only cause of these compressions is laziness and lack of imagination.
This is directly related to the fact that most filmgoers and television viewers have no access to equipment, and no ability to participate in these media except as spectators. Oddly enough, a similar thing happens in Stiegler, for even as he promises to address cinema in volume three of Technics and Timehis focus is less on films or filmmakers, or on the aesthetic potential of the medium, than on developing a sophisticated, but also largely negative, argument about cinema as an emblematic instance of the capture of modern technics by forces of power and control.
To the extent that this notion of the camera-pen is a metaphor, Astruc can be seen to be making a very similar — in fact, interchangeable — argument with Bazin in his piece on Welles and Citizen Kane.
With all due respect to Nadeau, a Descartes of today would already have shut himself up in his bedroom with a 16mm camera and some film, and would write his philosophy on film: The concept of the public sphere was discussed by Habermas in We see in them, if you like, something of the prophetic. This is what leads him to his strongest auteurist claim, asgruc few pages later: Cannot be reprinted without permission of the author and editors.
Alexandre Astruc – Wikipedia
As Dudley Andrew notes, Astruc and Bazin were quite intimate during the immediate postwar years. Let us now have a look at the way people make concessions to the supposed but fallacious requirements of the cinema.
Only a film critic could fail to notice the striking facial transformation which is taking place before our very eyes. Remember Eisenstein’s famous statement: The most philosophical meditations on human production, psychology, metaphysics, ideas, and passions lie well within its province.
Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise. It can tackle any subject, any genre. Ideas are created not simply through the juxtaposition of shots but in the relations established, within a single shot, between the various figures distributed across the frame, human or otherwise. In these terms, to say that language is an abstraction should not be understood exclusively in negative terms, for abstraction is not simply a subtraction, extraction or reduction of experience.
By language, I mean a form in which and by which an artist can express his thoughts, however abstract they may be, or translate his obsessions exactly as he does in the contemporary essay or novel. It is an art that cannot live by looking back over the past and chewing over the nostalgic memories of an age gone by.
It is not just a coincidence that Renoir’s La Regle du JeuWelles’s films, and Bresson’s Les Dames du Bois de Boulogneall films which establish the foundations of a new future for the cinema, have escaped the attention of critics, who in any case were not capable of spotting them.